Concept:The statement describes a cause-and-effect situation where expanding nightlife and public events increase demand for late-night food and hospitality services.
Explanation:The passage mentions a rise in late-night cultural festivals, concerts, and food exhibitions in metropolitan cities.
As a result, restaurants, cafés, and delivery services extended their hours beyond midnight to meet customer demand.
Business analysts observed higher weekend revenues and more footfall during major city events.
Urban planners linked this trend to changing lifestyles and growing nightlife culture.
Thus, the core idea is that increased nightlife and public events drive demand for late-hour food and hospitality services.
Option A is not supported because the passage never mentions daytime financial losses.
Option B is invalid since no government rule forcing restaurants to stay open is stated.
Option D is incorrect because the passage only talks about extending hours, not stopping daytime operations.
Option E is an extreme claim about shifting from home-cooked meals, which is not mentioned.
Therefore, Option C correctly summarizes the situation: greater late-night demand is created by increased nightlife activities and public events.
Answer:Increased nightlife activities and public events have created greater demand for food and hospitality services during late hours.