● First statement is correct. the 1 st Amendment to the constitution (1951) had inserted new Articles 31A and 31B and the Ninth Schedule, thus securing the constitutional validity of zamindari abolition laws by, among other things, specifying that they could not be challenged on the grounds that they violated the Fundamental Rights. Subsequent governments have added other progressive laws in the same, to give them immunity from litigation. Government add the acts in the 9th schedule, 'via parliament' so first statement is right. ● In I.R. Coelho case(2007), the Supreme Court ruled that there could not be any blanketimmunity from judicial review of laws included in the Ninth Schedule. So statement ddot2 is WRONG