Concept:The question requires determining three distinct integer weights whose sum is a prime number, using the given relationships between them.
Explanation:Using Statement-I alone: Let the weights be
x,
2x, and
y, where
x and
y are integers and
xî€ =y. The sum is
3x+y, a prime. There are infinitely many possibilities (e.g.,
x=1,
y=2 gives sum 5, prime, but weights 1,2,2 are not distinct). Hence Statement-I alone is insufficient.
Using Statement-II alone: Let the weights be
x,
3x, and
y. Sum is
4x+y, a prime. Again, infinite possibilities, so Statement-II alone is insufficient.
Using both statements together: There are two possible cases.
Case 1: The three weights are in the ratio
1:2:3. Let them be
x,
2x,
3x. Sum =
6x. For sum to be prime,
6x must be prime. But
6x is always divisible by 2 and 3 (for
x≥1), so it is composite (e.g.,
x=1 gives 6, not prime). No integer
x satisfies.
Case 2: The three weights are
x,
2x,
6x (since one is twice another and another is thrice a different weight). Sum =
9x. For sum to be prime,
9x must be prime. But
9x is divisible by 3 (for
x≥1), so it is composite (e.g.,
x=1 gives 9, not prime). No integer
x satisfies.
Both cases lead to no valid set of distinct integer weights with prime sum. Thus the information is contradictory and the question cannot be answered.
Answer:D