Concept:Parliamentary privileges are special rights and immunities enjoyed by MPs collectively and individually, distinct from ordinary citizens' rights under Article 19(1)(a).
Explanation:Parliamentary privileges are not restricted by Article 19(1)(a) because they derive from Article 105, not from the fundamental right to freedom of speech.
So statement 1 is correct.
Privileges must be read subject to Articles 20–22 (protection in criminal matters) and Article 32 (right to constitutional remedies), because these fundamental rights prevail over privileges.
Thus statement 2 is correct.
Immunity from arrest for MPs is only available in civil cases, not in criminal prosecutions.
Therefore statement 3 is incorrect.
The immunity under Article 105(2) applies only to speech in Parliament or its committees, not to speech in a private or personal capacity.
Hence statement 4 is incorrect.
Answer:1 and 2 only