Symbiosis National Aptitude Test SNAP 2014 Paper

The argument’s premises boil down to the following:
1. Wendy is a student who plays backgammon.
2. All students play either chess or checkers, but no backgammon player plays checkers.
Based on these premises we can conclude that Wendy plays chess. In order to also conclude that Wendy understands chess strategy, we must assume that all chess players understand chess strategy:
Premise: X is an A.
Assumption: All A’s are B’s.
Conclusion: X is a B.
Statement (a) provides the assumption needed to draw the conclusion.