SBI Clerk Prelims 27 Feb 2025 Shift 1 Paper

Question Numbers: 6-13
Read the passage given below and then answer the questions given below the passage.
Manila, the pulsating heart of the Philippines, has witnessed a dramatic surge in tourism, driven largely by the city's vibrant street art and historical architecture. This influx, while boosting the local economy, has created a complex tapestry of benefits and burdens for its residents. The iconic Intramuros, a walled city showcasing Spanish colonial heritage, has become a photographer's paradise. Tourists, eager to snap that perfect Instagram shot, often congregate in narrow alleyways, disrupting the daily lives of those who call these streets home. The breath taking view of Manila Bay’s sunset, once a tranquil moment for locals, is now frequently obscured by selfie sticks and camera flashes. The problem isn't just the sheer number of visitors; it's the lack of respect for the community. Many residents complain about tourists entering their private courtyards without permission, turning their homes into unwitting backdrops. The constant noise and congestion have made simple tasks, like grocery shopping or commuting to work, a frustrating ordeal.
To address these issues, the local government has _________ several measures. Designated photography zones have been established in popular areas, encouraging tourists to capture their memories without impeding pedestrian flow. Cultural sensitivity workshops are being offered to tour guides, emphasising the importance of respecting local customs and privacy. Moreover, a system of "community ambassadors" has been introduced, where residents are trained to interact with tourists, provide information, and gently guide them towards responsible behaviour. However, the most controversial solution has been the temporary barricading of certain residential streets during peak tourist hours. While this has effectively reduced congestion, it has also sparked debate about accessibility and the balance between tourism and local life. Critics argue that it creates a sense of exclusion and hinders residents' freedom of movement. Supporters, on the other hand, maintain that it's a necessary step to preserve the quality of life for those who have lived in these neighbourhoods for generations. The debate continues, highlighting the delicate dance between promoting tourism and protecting the soul of Manila.