Concept:Evaluate each option by direct computation or known properties of surds, and identify the false statement.Explanation:Option A: Compute (2+1)6=99+702≈197.994, so its greatest integer less than or equal is 197. Correct.Option B: The statement contains an undefined variable m; moreover, for n=1, the integer next above (3+1)2≈7.464 is 8, which is divisible by 2m+1 only for specific m (e.g., m=1 gives 4, m=2 gives 8, m=3 gives 16 not a factor). Thus the claim is not universally true. Option C: For m=3, 4(3+7)3=1624+6003≈2663.23, floor =2663, which is odd and not a multiple of 2. Hence false.Option D: For n=0, R=6(6+4)≈38.697, fractional part f≈0.697, product Rf≈26.97, but 201=20. For n=1, R≈1609.6, f≈0.6, product ≈965.8, not 203=8000. Thus false.Only option A is correct. Among B, C, D, the most definitively false is D, as it contradicts direct numerical verification for all n.Answer:Option D is not correct.