Concept:Evaluate each argument on its relevance, rationality, and practical impact.
Explanation:Argument I supports the restriction.
It directly addresses public welfare by reducing traffic congestion and air pollution.
This can lead to a better quality of life for all citizens.
So, Argument I is strong and relevant.
Argument II opposes the restriction.
It raises valid concerns about personal freedom and property rights.
It also questions whether such a limit can be implemented effectively.
These are important considerations in a democratic society.
So, Argument II is also strong.
Both arguments present reasonable and well-supported points from different perspectives.
Therefore, both arguments are independently strong.
Answer:D. Both I and II are strong