Statement 2 introduces the key fact about India's position (6th worst-affected) and sets up the climate impact discussion with a specific time frame (1993-2022). This works best as the opener. Statement 1 naturally follows by expanding the scope from India to show that 7 of the top 10 worst-affected are low/middle-income countries, building on the initial statistic. Statement 4 then draws the conclusion from these facts - that developing nations bear disproportionate climate burdens despite low historical emissions. This logically follows the evidence presented in 2 and 1. Statement 3 provides the contrasting perspective from high-income nations about responsibility, serving as an effective counterpoint to conclude the paragraph.This order 2→1→4→3 creates clear logical flow: Specific example (India) → Broader pattern (7/10 countries) → Conclusion about burden → Contrasting viewEach sentence naturally leads to the next; The correct order should therefore be 2143.