Correct option 4. Both I and II are strong. The statement asks if processions should get banned on the roads in India. Argument I supports the claim and suggests that they should be banned because with many people walking on the roads, the normal course of traffic gets hampered and it increases the woes of people. Therefore, argument I is strong. Argument II dismisses the claim by stating that people of India are entitled to a fundamental right of freedom, and banning processions will defy their fundamental right. Therefore, argument II is strong. Hence, option 4 is correct.