IBPS PO Mains 12 Oct 2025 Shift 1 Paper

Question Numbers: 92-97Direction: In the passage given below there are 6 phrases given in bold. Each blank has four alternative words given in options (1), (2), (3) and (4). You have to tell which will best suit the respective bank. Mark (5) as your answer if the phrase given in bold after the blank is your answer, i.e., 'No improvement required'.The rapid digitisation of the global education sector has shifted from a convenience to a structural necessity. With the sudden onset of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), traditional pedagogical models are being completely overhauled. However, as institutions rush to integrate customised large language models into their curricula, they are confronting with a digital divide (A) that deepens existing socioeconomic disparities. For AI tools to truly democratise learning, developers must focus on localising content, rather than assuming a one-size-fits-all framework. Moreover, schools must be cautious about over-relying on automated grading engines, which often fail to assess critical thinking and tend to view unique perspectives like anomalies (B) in student writing.Advocates argue that personalised AI tutors can offer real-time feedback, effectively functioning as a scalable equaliser for underprivileged classrooms. Yet, this optimistic outlook ignores the fact that millions of students still lack stable broadband access, rendering the promise of AI-driven equity to a distant dream (C). Educational boards must realise that technology should supplement, rather than supplant, human instruction. Instead of blindly procuring software licenses, administrations need to invest in training educators on how to leverage these tools responsibly (D). Only when teachers are empowered can technology transform classrooms into centres of active innovation, rather than spaces of passive consumption.Furthermore, data privacy remains a monumental concern as ed-tech platforms quietly harvest vast troops of student behavioural analytics. Critics have raised the red flag over the lack of stringent guardrails (E) protecting minors from targeted algorithm manipulation. Without robust legislative frameworks, the commercialisation of student data could lead to systemic profiling. If governments fail to intervene decisively at this junction, the commercial interests of tech conglomerates will inevitably triumph over student welfare (F), cementing inequities for generations to come.