Concept:A conclusion that aligns with all facts given in the statement is valid, while a conclusion that ignores or contradicts stated facts is invalid.
Explanation:The statement says Company X saw a
30% increase in revenue, and this growth coincided with three initiatives: sustainable fabrics, new high-speed weaving machines, and heavy e-commerce investment.
Conclusion I states that the success came from a multifaceted strategy covering product innovation, operational efficiency, and improved market reach.
This directly matches the three initiatives mentioned in the statement, so Conclusion I logically follows.
Conclusion II claims the revenue growth was entirely due to eco-friendly fabrics, and that the machinery and e-commerce investments were unnecessary.
This is not supported by the statement, which presents all three initiatives as part of the growth period.
It also contradicts the given information by dismissing two initiatives that the statement clearly highlights.
Therefore, Conclusion II does not follow.
Answer:Only Conclusion I follows. Hence, the correct answer is D. Only I follows.