Concept:This is a designation-based arrangement puzzle. We check whether Statement I alone, Statement II alone, or both together give one unique arrangement.
Explanation:Number the designations from senior to junior: CEO =
1, COO =
2, CFO =
3, CTO =
4, CMO =
5, CLO =
6.
From Statement I: K is senior to CFO, so K must be CEO or COO. Exactly two persons are designated between K and I, and I is senior to L. This produces more than one possible arrangement, so J's position is not fixed. Hence Statement I alone is not sufficient.
From Statement II: H is two positions senior to M, M is senior to J and L, and exactly one person is designated between K and J. This also gives multiple possible arrangements. Hence Statement II alone is not sufficient.
Combining both statements, the only valid arrangement is:
CEO-H, COO-K, CFO-M, CTO-J, CMO-I, CLO-L.
In this arrangement, M is immediately senior to J.
Answer:M (CFO) is just senior to J. Both statements I and II together are necessary. Correct option: C.