Examsnet
Unconfined exams practice
Home
Exams
Banking Entrance Exams
CUET Exam Papers
Defence Exams
Engineering Exams
Finance Entrance Exams
GATE Exam Practice
Insurance Exams
International Exams
JEE Exams
LAW Entrance Exams
MBA Entrance Exams
MCA Entrance Exams
Medical Entrance Exams
Other Entrance Exams
Police Exams
Public Service Commission (PSC)
RRB Entrance Exams
SSC Exams
State Govt Exams
Subjectwise Practice
Teacher Exams
SET Exams(State Eligibility Test)
UPSC Entrance Exams
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
CBSE
CBSE Question Papers
NCERT Books
NCERT Exemplar Books
NCERT Study Notes
CBSE Study Concepts
CBSE Class 10 Solutions
CBSE Class 12 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 11 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 12 Solutions
ICSE Class 10 Papers
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Careers
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
Test Index
GMAT Verbal Reasoning Practice Test 6
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 47
Total: 100
Demographers doing research for an international economics newsletter claim that the average per capita income in the country of Kuptala is substantially lower than that in the country of Bahlton. They also claim, however, that whereas poverty is relatively rare in Kuptala, over half the population of Bahlton lives in extreme poverty. At least one of the demographers’ claims must, therefore, be wrong.
The argument above is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?
It rejects an empirical claim about the average per capita incomes in the two countries without making any attempt to discredit that claim by offering additional economic evidence.
It treats the vague term “poverty” as though it had a precise and universally accepted meaning.
It overlooks the possibility that the number of people in the two countries who live in poverty could be the same even though the percentages of the two populations that live in poverty differ markedly.
It fails to show that wealth and poverty have the same social significance in Kuptala as in Bahlton.
It does not consider the possibility that incomes in Kuptala, unlike those in Bahlton, might all be very close to the country’s average per capita income.
Validate
Solution:
© examsnet.com
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Prev Question
Next Question