CLAT 2020 Question Paper with answer key for online practice

In his argument, Harry emphasized on the subject that in a democracy, people have full rights to know relevant information about the candidate or a party contesting election, whether it is positive or negative and to restrain someone to speak negative things about an election candidate would obstruct democracy and limit the right to freedom of speech.
Potter explained in his argument the impact of negative advertisements on politics and how it works. He mentioned that negative advertisements in elections produce personal political attacks and it helps to spread the negative information about a candidate's opponent to prospective voters so that general public does not vote for his opponents.
It is apparent from their debate that the main topic is about the negative advertisement and its impact on the politics and democracy.
Hence, the main issue of their debate is" Whether the practice of negative advertisements is good for democracy and politics?".