Exams Net
Unrestricted Exams Practice
Home
Exams
Banking
CUET
Defence
Engineering
Finance
GATE
Insurance
International
JEE
LAW
MBA
MCA
Medical
Other
Police
PSC
RRB
SSC
State Govt
Subjectwise
Teacher
SET Exams
UPSC
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
CBSE
CBSE Class 10 Solutions
CBSE Class 12 Solutions
CBSE Question Papers (Pdf)
NCERT Books (Pdf)
NCERT Exemplar Books (Pdf)
NCERT Study Notes (Pdf)
CBSE Study Concepts (Pdf)
NCERT Text Book Class 11 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 12 Solutions
ICSE Class 10 Papers
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
+
-
Default
Dark
Blue
Green
Violet
Crimson
Red
Cafe
Gold
Orange
Olive
Grey
Test Index
CAT 2017 Verbal and Reading Comprehension
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 26 of 34
Marks:
+1
,
-0
The Passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the authors's position.
A Delhi court sent Unitech Ltd promoters Ajay Chandra and Sanjay Chandra to police custody in an alleged fraud case related to a Gurugram-based real estate project. Metropolitan Magistrate sent the accused persons to two-day police custody after the probe agency said their custodial interrogation was required to find out the alleged money trail and the beneficiaries of the transactions. The agency had sought three days remand of both the accused claiming they were not cooperating in the investigation.
The counsel for the accused, however, opposed the remand plea, saying the police have already searched the premises of the accused and they cannot be forced to give any incriminating evidence against them. He urged the court to send the accused persons to judicial custody, saying the arrest was not required.
The accused were arrested for not developing a project, Anthea Floors, at Gurugram” a probe officer said, adding 91 people have invested Rs35 crore in the project.
The Chandras are accused of not developing the real estate project worth 35 crores as there are suspicions of the money being laundered in other ways to make it a huge profit for them.
The court sent the two promoters- The Chandras, to a police -custody of two days for being accused of not developing a real estate project worth 35 crores at Gurugram involving around hundred persons.
The court found the Chandras guilty of not developing the real estate project that has investment from more investors who seek relief from the court and thus custody is granted to the police.
The court is in a fix about the Chandras being guilty of an alleged involvement in the hidden profit worth 35 crores in a real estate project at Gurugram.
Validate
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
Prev Question
Next Question
More Free Exams
AP ICET Exam Previous Papers
CMAT Exam Previous Papers
IIFT Exam Previous Papers
MAT Exam Previous Papers
SNAP Exam Previous Papers
TS ICET Exam Previous Papers
XAT Exam Previous Papers