Examsnet
Unconfined exams practice
Home
Exams
Banking Entrance Exams
CUET Exam Papers
Defence Exams
Engineering Exams
Finance Entrance Exams
GATE Exam Practice
Insurance Exams
International Exams
JEE Exams
LAW Entrance Exams
MBA Entrance Exams
MCA Entrance Exams
Medical Entrance Exams
Other Entrance Exams
Police Exams
Public Service Commission (PSC)
RRB Entrance Exams
SSC Exams
State Govt Exams
Subjectwise Practice
Teacher Exams
SET Exams(State Eligibility Test)
UPSC Entrance Exams
Aptitude
Algebra and Higher Mathematics
Arithmetic
Commercial Mathematics
Data Based Mathematics
Geometry and Mensuration
Number System and Numeracy
Problem Solving
Board Exams
Andhra
Bihar
CBSE
Gujarat
Haryana
ICSE
Jammu and Kashmir
Karnataka
Kerala
Madhya Pradesh
Maharashtra
Odisha
Tamil Nadu
Telangana
Uttar Pradesh
English
Competitive English
CBSE
CBSE Question Papers
NCERT Books
NCERT Exemplar Books
NCERT Study Notes
CBSE Study Concepts
CBSE Class 10 Solutions
CBSE Class 12 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 11 Solutions
NCERT Text Book Class 12 Solutions
ICSE Class 10 Papers
Certifications
Technical
Cloud Tech Certifications
Security Tech Certifications
Management
IT Infrastructure
More
About
Contact Us
Our Apps
Privacy
Test Index
AILET 2016 LLM Question Paper with answer key for online practice
Show Para
Hide Para
Share question:
© examsnet.com
Question : 71
Total: 100
A car mechanic was employed by his master, the defendant to repair cars. He repaired a car and then drove the car for a short distance to check whether he had repaired the car properly or not. In the process he caused an accident injuring the plaintiff. The master is
Liable because it was his servant who had negligently caused the accident for which he was vicariously liable
Not liable because the mechanic was supposed to repair only and as such driving by him was outside his course of employment
Liable because driving was necessarily incidental to the duties of the mechanic since he was duty bound to check by driving whether the repair he had done were correctly done or not
Not liable because repairing and driving were two distinct acts, and the mechanic was not authorised to drive but was duty bound to repair only
Validate
Solution:
© examsnet.com
Go to Question:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
Prev Question
Next Question
More Free Exams:
AILET Previous Papers
BA LLB Banaras University
CLAT Previous Papers
LSAT India Practice Tests